State and local government agencies across the country are required to pay to publish the legal notices for public meetings, contract bids and other matters. The lobbying groups representing them in New Jersey say the measure would help save money, and that the option to post notices on their own websites recognizes changes in technology.
Lawmakers across the country have proposed eliminating the print requirement as newspapers have continued to lose readership. The New Jersey Press Association, which is lobbying against the legislation, says New Jersey would be the first state to make the change.
The lobbying groups for the state’s 21 counties and more than 500 municipalities both said Christie’s administration came to them this week to let them know the measure was being put forward.
Meanwhile, one Christie opponent in the Legislature called it a “politically motivated crackdown on the press in New Jersey.” Democratic Assemblyman John Wisniewski, who is running in the Democratic primary to replace Christie next year, also called it a “revenge bill.”
“This legal notices reform bill, which will save taxpayers and citizens going through foreclosure $80 million annually, was first proposed in 2010, not 2016,” Christie spokesman Brian Murray said in a statement. “It had nothing to do with the press then and nothing to do with them now.”
Murray said the $80 million figure was the amount paid by governments, businesses and citizens, including what it forecast as $60 million for pending foreclosure notices.
The state’s Office of Legislative Services was still working on an analysis to determine the measure’s financial impact. But when a similar measure was introduced in 2011, the group said it could not determine the financial impact on local governments. The New Jersey Press Association estimated at the time that local governments spent $20 million a year, but about 60 percent of that was reimbursed by private entities, including banks paying for foreclosure notices.
The New Jersey Association of Counties estimates the state’s 21 counties would save between $1 million and $1.25 million a year, and the League of Municipalities said 147 towns that responded to a survey paid $1.05 million in legal ads in 2015. That’s about a quarter of the towns in the state.
Murray did not reply to questions about how much it would cost towns and counties to set up the framework to manage posting the notice themselves.
The press association on Wednesday sent a letter to lawmakers that included a proposed compromise to cut the rate paid by governments by half while raising the rate on private companies.
While noting the financial hit they would take from the change, editorial boards from the state’s major newspapers have slammed what the measure could mean for transparency.
The bill would “weaken the press” and “defang the watchdogs who expose (public officials’) bad behavior,” the Star-Ledger’s editorial board wrote, pointing to potential job losses from the loss of revenue from the ads. An editorial in The Record said public notices ensure government transparency and it’s “foolhardy to believe that making government less accountable is good for anyone aside from government officials.”
But John Donnadio, head of the New Jersey Association of Counties, said the measure would streamline the process of posting legal notices and save some money.
“We understand the impact on the media industry, (but) counties, municipalities and school districts are all struggling to make ends meet, every little bit helps,” Donnadio said.
Associated Press writer Michael Catalini contributed to this story.